




|
 |
From icons
and onion domes to suprematism and the Stalin baroque, Russian art and
architecture seems to many visitors to Russia to be a rather baffling
array of exotic forms and alien sensibilities. Without any sense of
the rich tradition of Russian culture, an appreciation of the country's
enormous artistic wealth becomes a game of historical anecdote--"the
church where so-and-so took refuge from what's-his-name"--or a
meaningless collection of aesthetic baubles--"I like the blue domes
the best." In fact, Russian art and architecture are not nearly
so difficult to understand as many people think, and knowing even a
little bit about why they look the way they do and what they mean brings
to life the culture and personality of the entire country.
Icons
The tradition of icon
painting was inherited by the Russians from Byzantium, where it began
as an offshoot of the mosaic and fresco tradition of early Byzantine
churches. During the 8th and 9th centuries, the iconoclasm controversy
in the Orthodox church called into question whether religious images
were a legitimate practice or sacrilegious idolatry. Although the use
of images wasn't banned, it did prompt a thorough appreciation of the
difference between art intended to depict reality and art designed for
spiritual contemplation. That difference is one of the reasons that
the artistic style of icons can seem so invariant. Certain kinds of
balance and harmony became established as reflections of divinity, and
as such they invited careful reproduction and subtle refinement rather
than striking novelty. Although this philosophy resulted in a comparatively
slow evolution of style, icon painting evolved considerably over the
centuries. During the 14th century in particular, icon painting in Russia
took on a much greater degree of subjectivity and personal expression.
The most notable figure in this change was Andrey Rublyov, whose works
can be viewed in both the Tretyakov Gallery in Moscow and the Russian
Museum in St. Petersburg.
Unlike the pictorial tradition that westerners
have become accustomed to, the Russian icon tradition is not about the
representation of physical space or appearance. Icons are images intended
to aid contemplative prayer, and in that sense they're more concerned
with conveying meditative harmony than with laying out a realistic scene.
Rather than sizing up the figure in an icon by judging its distortion
level, take a look at the way the lines that compose the figure are
arranged and balanced, the way they move your eye around. If you get
the sense that the figures are a little haunting, that's good. They
weren't painted to be charming but to inspire reflection and self-examination.
If you feel as if you have to stand and appreciate every icon you see,
you aren't going to enjoy any of them. Try instead to take a little
more time with just one or two, not examining their every detail but
simply enjoying a few moments of thought as your eye takes its own course.
The best collections of icons are to be
found in the Tretyakov Gallery and the Russian Museum, though of course
many Russian churches have preserved or restored their traditional works.
The Great Experiment
The rising influence of European culture
in Russia during the 17th and 18th centuries brought Russian artwork
closer to the familiar traditions of western painting. It wasn't until
the end of the 19th century that the next great body of uniquely Russian
artistic styles arose, having developed in conjunction with liberal
forces of social reform. This modern movement took many different directions
almost from its inception, and it would be impossible to describe all
of them. However, even a very general acquaintance with their common
ideas and interests makes their work much more accessible.
From the start, the
modern art movement was concerned with breaking away from the classical
tradition and creating a new kind of art that was intimately engaged
with the daily life of Russian society. It developed a renewed interest
in traditional Russian art forms, including both decorative folk art
and, of course, icon painting. From decorative art it gained an appreciation
of the power of abstract geometrical patterns--lines, shapes, and color
were used to construct rhythms and energetic forms, not necessarily
to depict objects or actual spaces. The re-examination of icon painting
made painters more aware of the power of a flat, two-dimensional visual
perspective. In other words, they realized that they could treat the
canvas like a canvas, rather than trying to give the impression that
it was a window into a space.
From the end of the nineteenth century
until about 1910, the modern art movement remained most interested in
traditional aspects of Russian life--religion and village life were
as influential as the life of the great cities. As the forces of social
reform became more closely linked to the rising population of industrial
workers, Russia's avant-garde artists turned increasingly to the factory
and the frenetic pace of urban life for inspiration. Brilliant colours,
simplified and sharply angular forms, and an emphasis on the liberatory
energy of the modern world became the basis for new and increasingly
abstract compositions. Cubo-Futurism, Rayonnism and Suprematism were
the most important of the styles and schools that emerged during this
time. Among their most prominent artists were Kasimir Malevich, Vladimir
Tatlin, Mikhail Larionov, and Anna Goncharova.
After the 1917 Revolution, the Russian
Avant-Garde leapt into the service of the new Bolshevik regime. It seemed
to promise just the sort of break into a new world, and sweeping away
of the old, that they had been working for in art for years. They produced
political posters, organized street pageants and fairs, and, most notably,
carried out the design of the country's great public spaces for anniversary
celebrations of the Revolution. Caught up in the new regime's emphasis
on the importance of industrial power, they began to bring to composition
a sense of the rationality and technological focus of industrial work
and design. Constructivism, as this style is known, continued to evolve
into the late 1920s, when the conservatism of the Stalinist state renounced
the Avant-Garde in favor of Soviet Realism. Many of the prominent artists
of the earlier schools played a central role in Constructivism, especially
Tatlin. Other well-known artists of the Constructivist movement include
Alexander Rodchenko, Varvara Stepanova, and Liubov Popova.
Repudiated by the Stalinist government
and neglected in the west, the Russian Avant-Garde has only recently
received the attention it deserves. The Russian Museum in St. Petersburg
possesses the finest collection of its work.
Architecture
For most of its history,
Russian architecture has been predominantly religious. Churches were
for centuries the only buildings to be constructed of stone, and today
they are almost the only buildings that remain from its ancient past.
The basic elements of Russian church design emerged fairly early, around
the eleventh century. The plan is generally that of a Greek cross (all
four arms are equal), and the walls are high and relatively free of
openings. Sharply-sloped roofs (tent roofs) and a multitude of domes
cover the structure. The characteristic onion dome first appeared in
Novgorod on the Cathedral of Sancta Sophia, in the eleventh century.
On the interior, the primary feature is the iconostasis, an altar screen
on which the church's icons are mounted in a hierarchical fashion.
The centers of medieval church architecture
followed the shifting dominance of old Russia's cities--from Kiev to
Novgorod and Pskov, and, from the end of the 15th century, Moscow. With
the establishment of a unified Russian state under Ivan III, foreign
architecture began to appear in Russia. The first instance of such foreign
work is Moscow's great Assumption Cathedral, completed in 1479 by the
Bolognese architect Aritotle Fioravanti. The cathedral is actually a
remarkable synthesis of traditional Russian architectural styles, though
its classical proportions mark it as a work of the Italian Renaissance.
The Russian tradition experienced a brief period of renewed influence
under Ivan IV (the Terrible), under whose reign the legendary Cathedral
of St. Basil's was built. In general, however, the Tsars began to align
themselves increasingly with European architectural styles. The great
example of this shift was Peter the Great, who designed St. Petersburg
in accordance with prevailing European design. His successors continued
the pattern, hiring the Italian architect Rastrelli to produce the rococo
Winter Palace and Smolny Cathedral. Under Catherine the Great, the rococo
was set aside for neoclassicism, completing St. Petersburg's thoroughly
European topography.
During the nineteenth century a fresh interest
in traditional Russian forms arose. Like the associated movement in
the visual arts, this revival of older styles participated in the creation
of an avant-garde movement in the early twentieth century. For a brief
period following the 1917 Revolution, the avant-garde Constructivist
movement gained sufficient influence to design major buildings. Lenin's
Mausoleum, designed in 1924 by Alexey Shchusev, is the most notable
of the few remaining Constructivist buildings. By the late 1920s, the
avant-garde found itself repudiated by Stalin's increasingly conservative
state. Moving away from modernism, Stalinist-era architecture is best
exemplified by the seven nearly indistinguishable "wedding-cake"
skyscrapers that dominate the city's skyline.
In more recent years, the dissolution of
the Soviet state and a renewed interest in traditional Russian culture
have produced a new appreciation of more modest folk architecture. The
few remaining examples of traditional wooden architecture, such as those
on display in the outdoor architectural museum in Kostroma, are now
among Russia's most treasured architectural monuments.
Copyright (c) 2000 Dm.Core
Ltd.. All rights reserved.
|